Walton v. City of Raleigh
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Justice.
This case involves the interpretation of a consent judgment. A consent judgment is a court-approved contract subject to the rules of contract interpretation. Yount v. Lowe, 288 N.C. 90, 215 S.E.2d 563 (1975). If the plain language of a contract is clear, the intention of the parties is inferred from the words of the contract. Lane v. Scarborough, 284 N.C. 407, 410, 200 S.E.2d 622, 624-25 (1973).
In this case, the language is clear. It is said in the consent judgment that the plaintiffs may have access to the sewer line subject to their “obtaining tap-on privileges from the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lane v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Plant Food Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Yount v. LoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Mulberry-Fairplains Water Ass'n, Inc. v. Town of North WilkesboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Raintree Corp. v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
3Cited by105 opinions
- MCI CONSTRUCTORS, LLC v. City of GreensboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- State v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
- Lake Mary Ltd. Partnership v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Cara's Notions, Inc. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Turner v. Hammocks Beach Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.