Legal Opinion

Walton v. City of Raleigh

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 8, 1996No. 50A95PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

This case involves the interpretation of a consent judgment. A consent judgment is a court-approved contract subject to the rules of contract interpretation. Yount v. Lowe, 288 N.C. 90, 215 S.E.2d 563 (1975). If the plain language of a contract is clear, the intention of the parties is inferred from the words of the contract. Lane v. Scarborough, 284 N.C. 407, 410, 200 S.E.2d 622, 624-25 (1973).

In this case, the language is clear. It is said in the consent judgment that the plaintiffs may have access to the sewer line subject to their “obtaining tap-on privileges from the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lane v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Plant Food Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Yount v. LoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Mulberry-Fairplains Water Ass'n, Inc. v. Town of North WilkesboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  5. Raintree Corp. v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. MCI CONSTRUCTORS, LLC v. City of GreensboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  2. State v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Lake Mary Ltd. Partnership v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Cara's Notions, Inc. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  5. Turner v. Hammocks Beach Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2009

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API