Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1984No. 8317SC387PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

In their first assignment of error, plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in denying their pre-trial motion to amend their complaint. Plaintiffs sought to allege a claim under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 75-1.1 (1981), North Carolina’s unfair trade practice act, on the grounds that defendant forged a portion of plaintiffs’ insurance application, then tried to deny coverage under the policy because of misrepresentations in the application. The trial court denied plaintiffs’ motion to amend after defendant agreed to withdraw the portion of its defense based on misrepresentations in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Summey v. CauthenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Britt v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Hedgepeth Ex Rel. Hedgepeth v. ColemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Huff v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Henderson v. Rochester American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Martin v. HareCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Brown v. Family Dollar Distribution CenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Bell v. Nationwide InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Longobardi v. Chubb Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API