Legal Opinion
Bolden v. City of Topeka
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 28, 2008No. Civil Action 02-2635-KHVPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KATHRYN H. VRATIL, District Judge.
Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, James L. Bolden brings suit against the City of Topeka, Kansas alleging violation of his right to substantive due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. This matter comes before the Court on a bench trial, which the Court conducted on March 11, 2008. The Court finds that the City is entitled to judgment and makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law, as required by Rule 52(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Findings Of Fact
Plaintiff challenges the constitutionality of a local ordinance…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bonner v. City of BrightonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012