Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bonner v. City of Brighton

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 2012No. Docket No. 302677Published

1DissentMurray, J.

The trial court held that Brighton City Ordinance § 18-59 was facially unconstitutional on the basis that the ordinance’s presumption, that an unsafe structure with an estimated repair cost of 100 percent of the structure’s predeteriorated condition value should be demolished, violated plaintiffs’ right to substantive due process. The majority’s decision to affirm that decision is in error because there are circumstances under which the ordinance is valid. Additionally, the majority should not address whether this same section violates plaintiffs’ rights to procedural due process, as the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Forsyth County v. Nationalist MovementSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API