Legal Opinion
Ayer v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 12, 1933No. 29,444PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendant Beckel appeals from an order vacating a judgment in his favor entered on September 23, 1932, and granting plaintiff a new trial as to him. Plaintiff moves to dismiss on the ground that the order is not appealable.
The trial of the case resulted in a verdict against the defendant company and for defendant Beckel. The company’s motion, upon a settled case, for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial was denied; but on appeal a new trial was granted. 187 Minn. 169, 244 N. W. 681. Beckel was not a party to the appeal. The verdict in his favor was rendered January 9, 1932, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Noonan v. SpearSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Kimball v. PalmerleeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Smith v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Backstrom v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Morehart v. FurleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Target Stores, Inc. v. Twin Plaza Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Ayer v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Marriage of Moberg v. MobergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984