Legal Opinion
Ayer v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 30, 1933No. 29,444PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OLSEN, Justice.
The defendant Irvin J. Beckel appeals from an order setting aside a verdict and judgment in his favor and granting a new trial as to him.
The action is one against the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company and Irvin J. Beckel to recover damages for personal injury to plaintiff, claimed to have been caused by negligence on the part of the defendants. The case was tried in the district court and a verdict returned in favor of the plaintiff and against the railroad company on January 9, 1932. No verdict was rendered against defendant Beckel, and, under the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Noonan v. SpearSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Kimball v. PalmerleeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Smith v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Spicer v. StebbinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Backstrom v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ginsberg v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Satter v. TurnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Foster v. Herbison Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- State v. McCormickCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Brown v. BertrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.