Legal Opinion
Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Markham
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 11, 1946PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONGER, District Judge.
Cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
Both parties assert that there is present here no genuine issue as to any material fact, and each asks for summary judgment.
A brief reference to what has gone on before may perhaps be helpful.
On or about October 3, 1942, Leo T. Crowley, the then acting Alien Property Custodian, pursuant to the powers conferred on him by the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 1 et seq., and pursuant to Executive Order No.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kahn v. GarvanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1920
- In re the Estate of BendheimNew York Surrogate's Court · 1924
- Draeger Shipping Co. v. CrowleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. HicksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Keppelmann v. KeppelmannSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Brownell v. GebhardtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Cordero v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Estate of SchneiderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Public Administrator v. McGrathDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Herrmann v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.