Legal Opinion

Keppelmann v. Keppelmann

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 17, 1919PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal of A. Mitchell Palmer, alien property custodian. On appeal from the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Lane, whose opinion is reported in 89 N. J. Eq. 390.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gummere, Chief-Justice.

The bill in this case was filed by the complainants as trustees under the will of the late Adolphus Keppelmann for the purpose *68of obtaining instructions from the court with relation to the execution by them of certain of the trusts imposed upon them b3r the will. The situation which the case discloses, so far as the disposition of the matters in controversy makes their recital necessary, is as follows: Adolphus Keppelmann, at the time of his death, was a resident of South Orange, in this state. He died in 1913. By Iris will he…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kahn v. GarvanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1920
  2. In re MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  3. Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. MarkhamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946
  5. Brownell v. Union & New Haven Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API