Legal Opinion

United States v. Patel

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided January 11, 2013No. Criminal Action No. 5:11cr031PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MICHAEL F. URBANSKI, District Judge.

In this contraband cigarette trafficking and money laundering prosecution, defendant Anjay Patel (“Patel”) seeks to modify the protective order to release assets restrained by the government in pretrial forfeiture. In the notice of forfeiture appended to the indictment, the government seeks to forfeit $20.9 million in Patel’s assets, representing the purchase price of the contraband cigarettes bought by members of the Patel conspiracy. Patel claims that: (1) there is insufficient probable cause to support restraint at the $20.9 million…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. United States v. MonsantoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Nawaf HasanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. MannDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
  3. United States v. BokhariDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
  4. United States v. Jian-Yun DongDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
  5. United States v. MadduxDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API