Legal Opinion

United States v. Maddux

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided January 17, 2017No. CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 14-20-DLB-EBAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

David L. Bunning, United States District Judge

Subsequent to Defendants Christina Carman, Julie Coscia, Anthony Coscia, and Michael Smith being found guilty by a jury (Doc. # 345), the United States filed a Motion for Preliminary Judgment of Forfeiture. (Docs. # 378 and 402). Defendants Carman and Smith having filed Responses (Docs. # 407 and 412) and the United States having filed a Reply in Support of its Motion (Doc. # 410), this matter is now ripe for the Court’s review.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On January 27, 2016, Defendants Christina Carman,1 Julie…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. ElderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API