Legal Opinion

United States v. Jian-Yun Dong

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided April 27, 2017No. CRIMINAL NO.: 2:11-CR-511-BHHPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Bruce Howe Hendricks, United States District Judge

This matter is before the Court on two motions for Preliminary Orders of Forfei*452ture (“POFs”), (EOF Nos. 593; 793), filed by the United States of America (“the Government”) in the instant criminal action, the Government’s amended motion to hold the forfeiture of substitute assets in abeyance (ECF No. 656), and Defendant Jian-Yun Dong’s motion to stay the forfeiture order pending appeal (ECF No. 811). In light of the evidentiary record, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART the Government’s first POF motion, (ECF No.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. MonsantoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Libretti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. United States v. WarshakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Charles William McHan United States of America v. Charles William McHanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Candelaria-SilvaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API