Legal Opinion

Williams v. Citizens Bank of Guntersville

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 30, 1977PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

350 So.2d 1031 (1977)

Charles WILLIAMS

v.

The CITIZENS BANK OF GUNTERSVILLE.

SC 2193.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

September 30, 1977.

Rehearing Denied November 4, 1977.

Charles W. Williams, pro se.

No brief for appellee.

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from the trial court's granting summary judgment against Charles W. Williams, the plaintiff, in a suit alleging breach of contract. We affirm.

Initially, we make several observations. First, Mr. Williams represents himself and he is not an attorney. His brief is inadequate and he fails to carry the burden of proof necessary on appeal. Second, the record is confusing.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Bixby-Theirson Lumber Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Hinkle v. Railway Express AgencySupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. DiBenedetto v. DiRoccoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Bixby-Theisen Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. James S. Kemper & Co. v. Cox & AssociatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Roberson v. C.P. Allen Constr. Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  3. SMALLEY TRANSP. v. Bay Dray, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Bourgeois v. HughesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  5. Wright v. Schwerman Trucking Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API