Legal Opinion
Hinkle v. Railway Express Agency
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 22, 1942No. 6 Div. 711PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIVINGSTON, Justice.
The complaint, consisting of four counts, is based upon alleged violations of the provisions of sections 301, 302 and 304 of the Alabama Agricultural Code of 1927, Code 1940, Title 2, sections 461, 462 and 464.
Demurrers were sustained to each count of the complaint, and the plaintiff took a voluntary non-suit. Plaintiff filed motion for a new trial, which was overruled by the trial court, and to which ruling plaintiff reserved an exception. The questions presented for review do not call for a discussion of the propriety of this procedure.
For an understanding of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Price v. . PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Walls v. Smith & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- United States v. McCreadyDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1882
- McClusky v. DuncanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Oden v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Lemond Const. Co. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Bordas & Co. v. Secretario de AgriculturaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
- Thyssenkrupp Steel USA, LLC v. United Forming, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2013
- Smith v. FlynnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.