Legal Opinion

Bourgeois v. Hughes

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 23, 2010No. 2080981PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Judge.

Mary Bourgeois, the plaintiff below, appeals from a judgment insofar as it found in favor of two of the defendants below, Styx, L.L.C. (“Styx”), and Louie Hughes, an agent of Styx. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

On April 4, Bourgeois, who is a real-estate agent, and Styx entered into an agreement titled “Real Estate Sales Contract” (“the original contract”). Hughes signed the original contract only in his capacity as an agent of Styx; he did not sign the original contract in his individual capacity. The original contract stated, in pertinent part:

“The undersigned…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Hickox v. StoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Ex Parte RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Torres v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Philpot v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. K.L.R. v. K.G.S.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018
  2. K.L.R. v. K.G.S.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API