Legal Opinion

Hickman-Coleman Co. v. Leggett

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 5, 1909No. Civ. No. 539PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. George A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered against plaintiff upon an order sustaining defendant’s demurrer t'o plaintiff’s complaint.

The complaint is in four counts. The first two counts state, or attempt to state, a cause of action against defendant individually for services rendered to defendant by plaintiff in procuring a.purchaser for real estate belonging to the estate of Amanda M. Scales, deceased, of whose will defendant was the sole executor.

In the third and fourth counts plaintiff seeks to charge defendant, as executor, for services as broker in obtaining a purchaser for real estate…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lambert v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Adams v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Sterrett v. BarkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. McKee v. SoherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Briggs v. BreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Harm v. FrasherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Estate of MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Golden Gate Undertaking Co. v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Stewart v. BaxterOregon Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API