Legal Opinion

Golden Gate Undertaking Co. v. Taylor

California Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1914No. S.F. No. 6272PublishedCited by 36 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an action brought to recover the value of materials furnished and services rendered in the matter of the burial of James D. Taylor.

It was alleged that at the time of the death of James D. Taylor and for about fourteen days thereafter there were no relatives or heirs at law surviving deceased in the state of California ; that shortly before his death James D. Taylor requested Aimer F. Veale, his attending physician, to take charge of his body and upon his death to make all funeral arrangements ; that said deceased left a will wherein he appointed Aimer F. Veale and Bee Taylor…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sterrett v. BarkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Gurnee v. MaloneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. McLean v. CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Briggs v. BreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Estate of WillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Johnston v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. In Re Estate of MacFarlineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. First National Trust & Savings Bank v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Estate of KemmerrerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Palmer v. GreggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API