Legal Opinion
Russell Elliot Todd, Jr. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 4, 1969No. 28070_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
In this pro se case appellant has failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, F.R.A.P., and it is therefore appropriate to dispose of this case summarily pursuant to Rule 9(c) (2) of this Court. Stout v. Broom, 5th Cir. 1969, 406 F.2d 758.
This appeal is taken from the judgment of the district court denying without an evidentiary hearing a motion to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We affirm.
Appellant, represented by court-appointed counsel, was convicted on his pleas of guilty to two violations of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312. He was sentenced to concurrent terms…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- David Busby v. William C. Holman, Warden, Kilby PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Grant Cooper v. William C. Holman, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Bell v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1966
- Coleman Harper Bell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Earl C. Hunter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Albert Zales v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden, Louisiana State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Philip Marion Rice v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Albert Lee Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Leonard S. BendicksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Ruben Torres Mejia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.