Legal Opinion
Earl C. Hunter v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 19, 1969No. 27181_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of this court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I.
This is an appeal from the denial of a motion to vacate judgment and sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We affirm.
Appellant is serving a three-year sentence for violating 18 U.S.C. § 2312, the Dyer Act, having been convicted on his plea of guilty. In his § 2255…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Archie Raymond Streator v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Bell v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1966
- Bobby H. Pursley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Coleman Harper Bell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Philip Marion Rice v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Leonard S. BendicksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Russell Elliot Todd, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Ruben Torres Mejia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Donald B. Chandler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.