Legal Opinion

Albert Zales v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 21, 1970No. 28433PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge:

In this habeas corpus appeal, Petitioner asserts that invalid, pre-Gideon convictions were used to enhance his sentence, contrary to the dictates of Burgett v. Texas, 1967, 389 U.S. 109, 88 S.Ct. 258, 19 L.Ed.2d 319. Believing that a guilty plea to the habitual offender-enhancement charge forecloses his right to make this contention, we affirm.

In Burgett the Supreme Court held that “to permit a conviction obtained in violation of Gideon v. Wainwright [372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799] to be used against a person either to support guilt or enhance punishment…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Moore v. EstelleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. Lindsey Everett Holloway v. James A. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  3. Rufus Johnson v. Steve Puckett, Superintendent of the Mississippi State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  4. Johnny Lee Long v. O.L. McCotter Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. John Philip KwitekCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API