Legal Opinion
Walker v. City of Charlotte
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 4, 1964No. 261PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPabiceR, J.
Plaintiff in his brief states that the one question presented for decision is: Did Judge Clark commit prejudicial error in denying him a temporary restraining order enjoining defendants from further criminal prosecution of him for alleged violations of the housing provisions of the code of the city of Charlotte until the final determination of his suit?
G.S. 14-4 makes the violation of a municipal ordinance a criminal offense.
It is a general principle of well-established law that when a statute is enacted or a municipal ordinance is adopted regulating the doing of certain acts and making the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fenner v. BoykinSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Cline v. Frink Dairy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Hygrade Provision Co. v. ShermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Hygrade Provision Co., Inc. v. Sherman, Atty. Gen. Of New York Lewis & Fox Co. v. Same. Satz v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- High Point Surplus Company v. PleasantsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- High Point Surplus Co. v. PleasantsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Durham Council of the Blind v. EdmistenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Frosty Ice Cream, Inc. v. HordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Walker v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970