Legal Opinion
Hygrade Provision Co., Inc. v. Sherman, Atty. Gen. Of New York Lewis & Fox Co. v. Same. Satz v. Same
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 5, 1925No. Nos. 104, 105, and 106PublishedCited by 154 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland
These appeals challenge the constitutionality of cc. 580 and 581, 2 Laws of New York, 1922, pp. 1314^-1315, as being in contravention of the due process and equal protection of the law clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment and the commerce clause of the Constitution of the United States. So far as these cases are concerned, the statutes are substantially alike, and it is enough to refer to c. 581 which provides that any person who with intent to defraud: . . . “ 4. Sells or exposes for sale any meat or meat preparation and falsely represents the same to be kosher, or as having been prepared…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- In Re SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by154 opinions
- Hygrade Provision Co. v. ShermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. Joseph ManfrediCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- United States v. HilandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Hattie Mae Ricks v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Goocher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.