Legal Opinion

Frosty Ice Cream, Inc. v. Hord

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 25, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

The violation of a (valid) municipal ordinance is a misdemeanor. G.S. 14-4; S. v. Barrett, 243 N.C. 686, 91 S.E. 2d 917, and cases cited.

Plaintiffs do not allege that they, or any of them, were at any time prosecuted or arrested for alleged violation of said ordinance provisions. Since July 12, 1963, defendant has been restrained from obtaining warrants and making arrests for such violations.

Ordinarily, under a well-established general rule, an injunction will not lie to restrain enforcement of an ordinance creating a criminal offense. If, as plaintiffs allege, the ordinance provisions now…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schloss v. JamisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Constantian v. Anson CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. G I Surplus Store, Inc. v. HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. St. George v. . HardieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Fox v. Board of Commissioners of County of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. High Point Surplus Company v. PleasantsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Gulf Oil Corporation v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API