Legal Opinion
High Point Surplus Co. v. Pleasants
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided January 29, 1965No. 481PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPabKer, J.
The office of the demurrer here is to test the sufficiency in law of the complaint. This is a summary of the allegations of the complaint, except when quoted:
“[T]he plaintiff is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of North Carolina, with its principal place of business in the city of Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina.” (Emphasis ours.)
Defendant Pleasants is sheriff of Wake County, and is charged with the enforcement of all resolutions adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Wake County. All other defendants are members of the Board of County…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- McKinney v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- McDowell v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Shoe v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Wood v. . KincaidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Nicholson v. State Education Assistance AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Cinema I Video, Inc. v. ThornburgCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- CRLP Durham, LP v. Durham City/County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Long v. Currituck Cnty.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.