Legal Opinion

Wise v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided November 5, 1935No. 34PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

By the declaration the plaintiff has alleged a class of customers who subscribed to and used the system or services of the plaintiff. For the loss of these subscribers, due to the alleged action of the defendant, the plaintiff seeks to recover in the original declaration. This class of subscribers we shall, for convenience, call “primary” users.

The first amendment to the declaration brings in another class and seeks to recover for loss arising from the breach of business relations with this latter class. These we may call “secondary” users. No…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Griffin v. . ColverNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Den Norske Ameriekalinje Actiesselskabet v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Weinman v. De PalmaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Ohio-West Virginia Co. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Eaton v. Wilmington City Railway Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hercules, Inc. v. AIU InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  2. Coleman v. GarrisonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1971
  3. Traylor Engineering & Manufacturing Co. v. National Container Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1949
  4. Katz v. Exclusive Auto Leasing, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1971
  5. Richard Paul, Inc. v. Union Improvement Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API