Weinman v. De Palma
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP NEW MEXICO. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney
In November, 1901, Weinlnan, one of the plaintiffs in error, being the owner of a building and lot of land in Albuquerque, New Mexico, leased them to defendants in error for a term of two years, to commence in December, following. They entered into possession, and occupied and used the building in their business of prescription and retail druggists. Plaintiff in error Barnett was the owner of an adjoining lot and building. Some time in May or June, 1902, while the Weinman building was occupied by defendants in error, Barnett took down and removed his building, including the wall adjacent to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Chicago City v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
- Lovejoy v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. RahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Anvil Mining Co. v. HumbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Moran v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- United States v. RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Jacob v. MinerArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Joseph R. Foard Co. v. Maryland ex rel. GoralskiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1914
- West v. National Mines Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.