Legal Opinion
Richard Paul, Inc. v. Union Improvement Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 2, 1945No. Civ. 284PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, District Judge.
1. There was a breach of covenant on the part of defendant. 4 It is clear from the evidence that defendant failed to make the minor repairs contemplated in the lease. This is shown by the nature of the repairs made and paid for by plaintiff, which included cleaning the demised premises. It is equally apparent there was no collateral agreement that the building met the requirements of the various building ordinances of the city of Wilmington. There is no implied warranty that the premises are fit for the particular purpose to which they are to be put. Stein v. Bell…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Huddleston v. DwyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Cutter v. HamlenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brown v. Robyn Realty Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1976
- United States v. 15.3 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in the City of ScrantonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- Brooklyn Waterfront Terminal Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- Consolidated Vultee Aircraft Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1951
- Collier v. Leedom Construction Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.