Legal Opinion

Witten v. Murphy

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 19, 1984No. 8589; CA A27786PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

This is a proceeding to establish a statutory way of necessity. ORS 376.150-376.200. The county court granted petitioners a way across defendants’ land. The Circuit Court affirmed, ORS 376.175(4), and defendants appeal. The question is whether petitioners have carried their burden to show that they have no “existing enforceable access to a public road,” 376.180(8), and that they could not “acquire an easement for access to a public road through other legal action.” ORS 376.180 (9). We review de novo, ORS 5.120(2) and ORS 19.125(3), and affirm.

Petitioners and defendants separately own several…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. BurkOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Thompson v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Thompson v. SchuhOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Douglas County v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Holland v. Grant CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bradley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Pike v. WyllieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. Tyska v. PrestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Pacific Western Co. v. Lincoln CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Pike v. WyllieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API