Williams v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.
The petition of Jack Mitchell Williams is in form one for a writ of prohibition or other appropriate writ. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, the proceeding will result in the issuance of a writ of mandamus. If a writ of prohibition is uncalled for but the facts warrant positive relief, a writ of mandate may issue (Proctor & Gamble Mfg. Co. v. Superior Court, 124 Cal.App.2d 157 [268 P.2d 199]); a writ of mandate has been heretofore granted when petitioner was denied his constitutional right to counsel (Vasquez v. District Court of Appeal, 59 Cal.2d 585 [30 Cal.Rptr. 467, 381 P.2d…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Browne v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Sawyer v. BarbourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In Re SmileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- In Re Ricky H.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Ingram v. Justice CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Schmidt v. UhlenhoppSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- People v. LongwithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.