Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Justice Court

California Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1968No. Sac. 7831PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.

On this appeal from a judgment ordering issuance of a writ of mandate, we are called upon to decide whether the trial court has the power to review the determina tion of a public defender that an accused who requests his services is “not financially able to employ counsel” (Gov. Code, §27706, subd. (a)). We conclude that such a determination is not subject to judicial, as distinguished from political, review and that this rule is applicable although the public defender’s services are sought for a collateral attack on a final judgment rather than a defense to a pending charge.

In 1959 Marcus…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. McKenzieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Black Panther Party v. KehoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Palomo v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API