Ingram v. Justice Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.
On this appeal from a judgment ordering issuance of a writ of mandate, we are called upon to decide whether the trial court has the power to review the determina tion of a public defender that an accused who requests his services is “not financially able to employ counsel” (Gov. Code, §27706, subd. (a)). We conclude that such a determination is not subject to judicial, as distinguished from political, review and that this rule is applicable although the public defender’s services are sought for a collateral attack on a final judgment rather than a defense to a pending charge.
In 1959 Marcus…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Maxwell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. McKenzieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Black Panther Party v. KehoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Palomo v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.