Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. Uhlenhopp
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided February 8, 1966No. 52025PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, C. J.
We granted certiorari under rules 306 to 319, Rules of Civil Procedure, to review orders of respondent-judge refusing to appoint counsel at public expense for petitioner, charged with a felony. We must sustain the writ and annul the orders.
Petitioner was charged with the crime of assault with intent to inflict great bodily injury in violation of section 694.6, Code, 1962. When he appeared in municipal court in response to the preliminary information he asked that an attorney be appointed to represent him, evidently on the ground he was unable to employ any. The request was granted and Paul D.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- McNabb v. OsmundsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- Chambers v. District Court of Dubuque CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- English v. MissildineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- State v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.