Legal Opinion
Rizzo v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 30, 2013No. Case No. CV 12-04347 DMG (FMOx)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. ## 17,18]
DOLLY M. GEE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant, the Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (“ICSOP”) [Doc. # 17], and the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Robert A. Rizzo [Doc. # 18]. The Court has duly considered the parties’ arguments and evidence in support of and in opposition to the cross-motions. For the reasons discussed below, ICSOP’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Bell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- City of Bell v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- City of Bell v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- City of Bell v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Robert Rizzo v. Ins. Co. of the State Penn.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.