Legal Opinion
State v. Stanley
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 25, 1992No. 14238PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The defendant, Kevin Stanley, appeals to this court1 from the judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a.2 The defendant claims that: (1) there was insufficient evidence of an intent to kill in order to convict him of murder; (2) the trial court improperly admitted a statement made by the defendant because the waiver of his Miranda3 rights was not made knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily; (3) the trial court improperly admitted a statement made by the defendant because his right to terminate police interrogation after he had invoked…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. WaltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. SchiappaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.