Legal Opinion
Mangrum v. Fensco, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 28, 1999No. 91,415PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHodges, J.
¶ 1 Fensco, Inc. (Employer) and its insurer seek vacation of that portion of an opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals which concluded that section 16(D) of the Workers’ Compensation Act entitled Denny R. Mangrum (Claimant) to benefits at the temporary total disability rate during vocational rehabilitation. Certiorari review was granted to clarify the proper application of that provision. This Court holds that section 16(D) does not entitle a claimant who is adjudicated permanently but only partially disabled to receive benefits at the temporary total disability rate during vocational…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- McNeill v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- City of Norman v. StevesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Arrow Tool & Gauge v. MeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Blitz U.S.A., Inc. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Bronson Trailers & Trucks v. NewmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Kinslow Round-Up Inc. v. City of SeminoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- In Re De-Annexation of Certain Real PropertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.