Legal Opinion

DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Levin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 2008No. 2006-1731PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

{¶ 1} In this appeal, DaimlerChrysler Corporation (“DCC”), a car manufacturer, asks the court to reverse a decision by the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) that affirmed two use-tax assessments that had been affirmed by the Tax Commissioner. The assessments require DCC to pay use taxes with respect to repair parts and repair services that DCC paid for under its “goodwill repair” program. DCC had no contractual obligation to pay for the repairs at issue, but did so in order to retain and foster goodwill with its car buyers.

{¶ 2} DCC advances several arguments why the BTA’s decision should be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Coca-Cola Bottling Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. General Motors Corp. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. American Cyanamid Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Drackett Products Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Department of Revenue v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API