Drackett Products Co. v. Limbach
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The question *205presented is whether directing a publisher to publish advertising to be inserted into Ohio newspapers in concert with other advertisers is a taxable use of tangible personal property for an advertiser under R.C. 5741.02(A) and 5741.01(C).
R.C. 5741.02(A) provides:
“* * * [A]n excise tax is hereby levied on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property * *
R.C. 5741.01(C) provides:
“ ‘Use’ means and includes the exercise of any right or power incidental to the ownership of the thing used.”
Appellant argues that it simply purchased advertising space…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Caldor, Inc. v. HeffernanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- K Mart Corp. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. J. C. Penney Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
- K Mart Corp. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Service Merchandise Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- General Motors Corp. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Mervyn's v. Arizona Dept. of RevenueArizona Tax Court · 1993
- TV Fanfare Publications, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.