Legal Opinion

Drackett Products Co. v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1988No. 87-787PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The question *205presented is whether directing a publisher to publish advertising to be inserted into Ohio newspapers in concert with other advertisers is a taxable use of tangible personal property for an advertiser under R.C. 5741.02(A) and 5741.01(C).

R.C. 5741.02(A) provides:

“* * * [A]n excise tax is hereby levied on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property * *

R.C. 5741.01(C) provides:

“ ‘Use’ means and includes the exercise of any right or power incidental to the ownership of the thing used.”

Appellant argues that it simply purchased advertising space…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Caldor, Inc. v. HeffernanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. K Mart Corp. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. J. C. Penney Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
  5. K Mart Corp. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Service Merchandise Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  2. General Motors Corp. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Mervyn's v. Arizona Dept. of RevenueArizona Tax Court · 1993
  4. TV Fanfare Publications, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API