Legal Opinion

General Motors Corp. v. Wilkins

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 2004No. 2002-1894PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

{¶ 1} General Motors Corporation (“GM”) appeals from a Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) decision affirming use-tax assessments against GM for amounts it paid for parts and services provided by GM’s Ohio dealers to repair motor vehicles under GM’s warranty and special-policy repair programs.

{¶ 2} Agreements between GM and its dealers, entitled “Dealer Sales and Service Agreements,” provided that the dealers would perform all repairs covered by warranty or a repair program on each qualified vehicle, using only GM-approved parts. The services and parts provided by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. American Restaurant & Lunch Co. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. North Missouri Railroad v. MaguireSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Osborne Bros. Welding Supply, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. WCI Steel, Inc. v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. N.A.T. Transp., Inc. v. McClain (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  3. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. MobarakOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API