State ex rel. Cotterman v. St. Marys Foundry
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentWright, J.
I respectfully dissent and would affirm the court of appeals’ decision based upon two independently sufficient grounds.
First, the appellant did not exhaust her administrative remedies when she failed to timely file a motion for a rehearing. A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that may be denied when a relator fails to exhaust his administrative remedies since an administrative appeal is an adequate remedy at law. Kaufman v. Newburgh Heights (1971), 26 Ohio St. 2d 217, 55 O.O. 2d 462, 271 N.E. 2d 280. The exhaustion of administrative remedies, of course, is not necessary if there is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Mitchell v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- State ex rel. Humble v. Mark Concepts, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1979
- Kaufman v. Village of Newburgh HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- State ex rel. Mees v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State Ex Rel. United States Steel Corp. v. CookOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.