T.A. Loving Co. v. Denton
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TERRENCE W. BOYLE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Motions for Summary Judgment by the T.A. Loving Company, Brent Adams and Brent Adams & Associates, P.C., William Eugene Hooker, and Christina P. Medlin and a Motion to Compel by the T.A. Loving Company. For the reasons set forth herein, the T.A. Loving Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as against Annette Denton but DENIED as against Brent Adams and Brent Adams & Associates; Brent Adams and Brent Adams & Associates’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; William Eugene Hooker’s Motion for Summary Judgment…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- N. Brown FELTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRAVES-HUMPHREYS COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barnhill Contracting Co. v. OxendineDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
- Duke Energy Benefits Committee v. HeafnerDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022
- MANN+HUMMEL Filtration Technology US LLC v. PattersonDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022
- Synchrony Financial Welfare Benefits Committee v. PattonDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022