Barnhill Contracting Co. v. Oxendine
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim by defendants Roy Bain and Bain & Rodzik PC (the “Bain defendants”) (DE 7). Plaintiff responded in opposition, and the Bain defendants replied. The court stayed further case scheduling activities pending resolution of the motion. In this posture, the issues raised are ripe for ruling. For the following reasons, the Bain defendants’ motion to dismiss will be granted in part and denied in part, and the court will lift the stay.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, as plan sponsor,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Nemet Chevrolet, Ltd. v. Consumeraffairs. Com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Duke Energy Benefits Committee v. HeafnerDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022
- MANN+HUMMEL Filtration Technology US LLC v. PattersonDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022
- Synchrony Financial Welfare Benefits Committee v. PattonDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022
- Verizon Sickness and Accident Disability Benefit Plan for New England Associates v. RogersDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2023