Legal Opinion

United States v. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided August 28, 2002No. 3:01-cv-02342PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

FISH, Chief Judge.

Before the court are the motions of the plaintiff United States of America (“United States”) to strike the affirmative defenses of the defendants Cushman & Wakefield, Inc. and Cushman & Wakefield of Michigan, Inc. (collectively, “C & W”) and to dismiss the counterclaims of C & W. For the reasons discussed below, the motion to strike is granted and the motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part.

I. BACKGROUND

The United States filed this action on November 20, 2001 against C & W, Interi- or Systems, Inc. (“ISI”), and William F. Marcellino…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. in Re Xerox Corporation and Xerox State Healthcare, LLC F/K/A Acs State Healthcare, LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. CubanDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2011
  3. U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Kraft Foods Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  4. Georgacarakos v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Citizens Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API