Loloff v. Sterling
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from the District Court of Weld County. This is an action under the eminent domain act to acquire hy condemnation a site.for a reservoir for storing water to irrigate farm lands^ The cause was tried before a jury, and from its award and the judgment thereupon entered by the court the land-owner has brought the case here by appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Chiee Justice Campbell
delivered the opinion of the court.
1. Appellee questions the right of appellant to he heard upon certain errors assigned because they were not included in his motion for a new trial.. The point made is that if a party neglects to bring before the trial court, hy his motion for a new trial, where the case is tried before a jury, the grounds which might there have been urged for granting a new trial, he may not thereafter, upon a review of the judgment rendered against him, be heard upon such omitted mátters. The argument is based, in part at least, upon the proposition…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Denver City Irrigation & Water Co. v. MiddaughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Brown v. WilloughbySupreme Court of Colorado · 1879
- Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. GriffithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
- City of Grand Rapids v. LuceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Cowan v. CowanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Wassenich v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- City & County of Denver v. LyttleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
- Langdon v. Loup River Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- Goldstein v. Denver Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- Mulford v. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1916
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.