Legal Opinion

Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. Griffith

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1892PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to District Court of Ouray County.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hayt

This proceeding was instituted by the Denver & Rio Grande Railroad Company, plaintiff in error, under the eminent domain act, to condemn a right of way over a certain placer claim near the town of Ouray in Ouray county, Colorado, the property of the defendant in error, Emma Vu Griffith. The proceeding was commenced by petition presented to the judge of the district court of the Seventh judicial district in vacation, upon which an ex parte order was made, giving plaintiff in error the right to take possession of said lands for the purposes indicated, upon making a deposit of $1,000 with the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Colorado Cent. R. v. AllenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  2. Tripp v. OverockerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  3. Denver & Rio Grande R. R. v. StarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wassenich v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  2. Boxberger v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  3. State Ex Rel. State Road Commission v. BouchelleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Yellowstone Park Railroad v. Bridger Coal Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Loloff v. SterlingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API