Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. Denver Urban Renewal Authority
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided February 7, 1977No. C-928PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
We granted certiorari to review Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. Goldstein, 37 Colo. App. 244, 548 P.2d 930 (1975), which set aside a certificate of ascertainment and assessment and ordered a new trial. We reverse.
Denver Urban Renewal Authority (DURA) filed an action in eminent domain to obtain title to real property owned by petitioner Goldstein. The parties stipulated to a value of $22,000 for the improvements on the property. Trial was held before a commission of three freeholders, pursuant to section 38-1-101 and 38-1-105, C.R.S. 1973.
It is undisputed that the highest and best use for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Wassenich v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- Department of Highways v. SchulhoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Board of County Commissioners v. Vail Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Buena Park School District v. Metrim Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Denver Joint Stock Land Bank v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Board of Assessment Appeals v. Colorado Arlberg ClubSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Jagow v. E-470 Public Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- People v. BornmanColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Schafer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Palizzi v. City of BrightonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.