Legal Opinion

City of Grand Rapids v. Luce

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1892PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from superior court of Grand Bapids. (Burlingame, J.) Street-opening case. Respondents appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Morse, O. J.

The appellants bring to this Court the proceedings in the opening of McDowell street, in the *93city of Grand Eapids, from Jefferson avenue to Madison avenue, alleging error in such proceedings.

Before such proceedings were instituted, McDowell street existed as a public street from Jefferson avenue west to Buchanan street. From Jefferson avenue east to South Lafayette street, passing Cass street, the south half of the street had been opened by the platting of landowners to a width of 33 feet. The lands of Frederick E. Luce and Gregory M. Luce lie on the north side of said 33 feet,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Roberts, Throp & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Perkins v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  3. City of Detroit v. BeecherMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Loloff v. SterlingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
  2. National Surety Co. v. Citizens' Light, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Brazier v. BrazierIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Deal v. HainleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API