Commonwealth v. Black
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, President Judge:
The instant appeal arises from the judgment of sentence imposed on a verdict of guilty for theft following a jury trial. Appellant’s principal contention is that the court erred in accepting what appellant characterizes as an illegal verdict.1 Therefore, appellant claims he is entitled to a new trial. We disagree and will affirm the judgment of sentence.
*601At trial appellant stood accused of two counts of theft by unlawful taking or disposition,2 and one count of burglary,3 all arising from the same criminal episode. Due to its misconstruction of a provision of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Moszczynski v. AsheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Commonwealth v. SimmonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. WilksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. PriceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. KingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BoernerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. HaleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. LarsenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. ShafferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. MaguireSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.