Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Boerner

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1980No. 1717PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Judge:

Appellant was convicted in a jury trial of criminal conspiracy, 18 Pa.C.S. § 903, theft by unlawful taking of movable property 18 Pa.C.S. § 3921(a), theft by receiving stolen goods, 18 Pa.C.S. § 3925, and retail theft, 18 Pa.C.S. § 3929. Post-verdict motions were filed and denied. Concurrent sentences of three to six years for theft of movable property and two-and-a-half to five years for retail theft were imposed. The sentence for criminal conspiracy was three to six years, to run consecutive to the other two sentences. 1

I

Appellant’s first contention is that the evidence was…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. Busic v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Swafford v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. FortuneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. GemelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API