Commonwealth v. Boerner
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Judge:
Appellant was convicted in a jury trial of criminal conspiracy, 18 Pa.C.S. § 903, theft by unlawful taking of movable property 18 Pa.C.S. § 3921(a), theft by receiving stolen goods, 18 Pa.C.S. § 3925, and retail theft, 18 Pa.C.S. § 3929. Post-verdict motions were filed and denied. Concurrent sentences of three to six years for theft of movable property and two-and-a-half to five years for retail theft were imposed. The sentence for criminal conspiracy was three to six years, to run consecutive to the other two sentences. 1
I
Appellant’s first contention is that the evidence was…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Busic v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Swafford v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. FortuneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. GemelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.