Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Wilks

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1977No. 2213PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant raises the following contentions for our review. (1) The evidence is insufficient to convict appellant of simple assault; 1 (2) the evidence is insufficient to convict appellant of burglary; 2 (3) the proof at trial varied from the allegations in the information; (4) conviction of burglary and simple assault is impermissible; (5) the substantive amendment of the information charging burglary was improper; (6) the court improperly permitted the amendment of the private criminal complaint to include the charges of burglary and indecent assault; (7) the private criminal…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. DancerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. TwiggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. MadisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. BoernerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. LawtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. State v. MottaHawaii Supreme Court · 1983

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API