Dreyfus v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Petitioner seeks review of a disciplinary proceeding in which the Board of Governors of The State Bar found that he " intentionally misappropriated and expended for his own purposes the sum of $10,594.81 [sic] 1 entrusted to him by clients. The board recommended disbarment by a vote of ten to four, with three of the minority stating that they believed the discipline too severe. In arriving at its recommendation the board expressly considered a previous one-year suspension, imposed in 1952, for commingling funds of a client and withholding them to coerce payment of a fee. Petitioner…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sturr v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Stanford v. the State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Browne v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Webb v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Glover v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Younger v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Black v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Yapp v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Mrakich v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973