Legal Opinion
Kramer v. Boynton
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 23, 1968No. Civ. 30928PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKaus, P. J.
This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial to plaintiff after a jury verdict in favor of defendant. The trial court specifically based the order upon the ground that the evidence was-insufficient to justify the verdict and, as will appear, specified its reasons.
The action is for battery. The harmful touching of plaintiff was admitted by defendant on the stand. The only real issue —apart from damages—was self defense.
Plaintiff and defendant were both employed by Deana Dee, a ladies’ coat manufacturer. Plaintiff was a cloth cutter, defendant was the shipping and receiving clerk. On…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- In Re CreglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Yarrow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Keister v. O'NeilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Mehling v. SchieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Meiner v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- O. G. Sansone Co. v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Funderburk v. General Telephone Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Dixon v. St. Francis Hotel Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- McLaughlin v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.