Legal Opinion

Dixon v. St. Francis Hotel Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 14, 1969No. Civ. 24142PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order granting new trial in this action for personal injuries. The jury, by a vote of 10 to 2, returned a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $35,000. New trial was granted on the grounds of error in law in admission of hearsay evidence and insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict. Appellant devotes most of her argument to the sufficiency issue, and neither respondent argues that there was an error in law. Hence we consider only whether the evidence was insufficient.

On a Saturday, plaintiff waited some 15 minutes in the lobby of the Sir Francis Drake…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Yarrow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Kincaid v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Curland v. Los Angeles County Fair Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Scala v. Jerry Witt & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Hale v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Meiner v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Jones v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Martinez v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API